4
Given: A+B (A is B's brother), A-B (A is B's sister), AxB (A is B's father). Identify the expression that indicates C is M's son.
0:00
Solution: Step 1: We need to find an expression where M is a parent of C, and C is male.
Step 2: Evaluate the option 'M x N - C + F':
* M x N: M is the father of N (M is male).
* N - C: N is the sister of C (N is female).
* C + F: C is the brother of F (C is male).
Step 3: From N - C and C + F, N, C, and F are siblings, and C is male.
Step 4: M is the father of N. Since N, C, and F are siblings, M is also the father of C.
Step 5: Since C is male and M is his father, C is the 'Son' of M.
10
In a family of six members (A, B, C, D, E, F), B is the son of C. C is not the mother of B. A and C are married. E is C's brother. D is A's child. F is B's brother. Identify the female members.
0:00
Solution: Step 1: Analyze given information:
- B is son of C.
- C is not the mother of B, so A must be the mother of B.
- A and C are married.
- E is C's brother.
- D is A's child, making D a female.
- F is B's brother.
Step 2: Determine female members:
- A is female (mother of B).
- D is female (child of A).
Step 3: Conclusion:
The female members of the family are A and D.
11
Given: A $ B = A is brother of B; B * C = B is son of C; C @ D = C is wife of D; A # D = A is son of D. How is C related to A?
0:00
Solution: Step 1: Analyze the given codes:
A $ B → A is the brother of B (A is male)
B * C → B is the son of C (B is male)
C @ D → C is the wife of D (C is female, D is male)
A # D → A is the son of D (A is male)
Step 2: From 'A $ B', A is the brother of B.
Step 3: From 'B * C', B is the son of C.
Step 4: Combining steps 2 and 3, if B is the son of C, and A is B's brother, then A is also the son of C.
Step 5: From 'C @ D', C is the wife of D. (C is female).
Step 6: Since A is the son of C, and C is female, C is the mother of A.
Step 7: The information 'A # D → A is the son of D' further confirms that if C is A's mother, then D must be A's father, which is consistent with C being D's wife.
17
How is Sulekha related to Nandini? Statement I: Sulekha's husband is the only son of Nandini's mother. Statement II: Sulekha's brother and Nandini's husband are cousins.
0:00
Solution: Step 1: Analyze Statement I. 'Sulekha's husband is the only son of Nandini's mother.' Nandini's mother's only son must be Nandini's brother. Therefore, Sulekha's husband is Nandini's brother. This means Sulekha is Nandini's sister-in-law. Statement I alone is sufficient.
Step 2: Analyze Statement II. 'Sulekha's brother and Nandini's husband are cousins.' Let Sulekha's brother be X and Nandini's husband be Y. X and Y are cousins. This implies their parents are siblings. However, this information is not sufficient to uniquely determine Sulekha's relationship to Nandini (e.g., sister-in-law) without additional assumptions or very specific family structures not explicitly stated. The statement itself does not directly connect Sulekha's marital status to Nandini's brother. Therefore, Statement II alone is not sufficient.
Step 3: Based on a strict interpretation, only Statement I is sufficient. However, if we assume a specific structure that would lead to 'Either I or II', such as Sulekha's brother is also Nandini's brother, and their cousin happens to be Nandini's husband, it becomes more convoluted. Adhering to the logical conclusion based on explicit information, Statement I alone is sufficient.